UFO sightings would be subjected to an “Accurate scientific inquiry,” according to the Pentagon.

According to a Department of Defense official, agencies are dedicated to “a deliberate effort to discover their origins.”

ufo

In a rare public hearing on the highly secretive and controversial subject, the Pentagon’s top intelligence official promised to use “rigorous scientific research” to figure out where UFOs come from.

According to his prepared testimony, DoD’s undersecretary for intelligence Ronald Moultrie told a House Intelligence Committee subcommittee that the Pentagon is committed “to a deliberate effort to discover their sources.”

Open C3 Subcommittee Hearing on Unidentified Aerial Phenomena (UFO)

“It is the Department’s view that, by combining suitably formatted collected data with rigorous scientific analysis, any object that we meet can most likely be isolated, described, identified, and, if required, neutralized,” he stated.

This includes determining if the reports are explainable by future technology breakthroughs by allies or rivals, covert US vehicles or “commercial platforms,” or “natural or other occurrences.”

The meeting takes place amid an internal battle about how much information to share with the public, as well as congressional criticism of intelligence agencies for being less than forthright about what they’ve learned so far.

Moultrie, a National Security Agency veteran who has been in his current position since June, also provided the committee with a quite limited definition for “unexplained aerial phenomena,” the government’s name for UFOs.

He defined them as “airborne items that cannot be instantly identified when encountered.” His prepared testimony omitted several of their stated qualities that contradict known aerodynamics, as well as accounts of craft that appeared to shift between the sea, air, and space.

Scott Bray, the deputy director of naval intelligence, joined Moultrie on stage.

He also admitted that the “cultural stigma” associated with UFOs has hampered efforts to explain the phenomenon by discouraging witnesses from coming forward.

In his prepared evidence, he noted, “We also appreciate that there has been a ‘cultural stigma’ surrounding UAP reporting.” “By completely integrating our operators and mission people into a uniform data collection procedure, we hope to erase this stigma.”

“We believe that making UAP reporting a mission priority will be critical to the success of this effort,” he said, offering to collaborate with other intelligence and law enforcement organisations as well as overseas partners.

Also Read: Phoenix Suns’ Season Ends With a Jaw-Dropping 123-90 loss

Moultrie said the Department of Defense is “completely dedicated to the ideals of openness and responsibility to the American people” when it comes to how much information to share with the public. We are, nevertheless, conscious of our responsibility to safeguard sensitive sources and procedures.”

“Our goal,” he continued, “is to find that delicate balance – one that allows us to keep the public’s trust while preserving those capabilities that are critical to our service personnel’s support.”

Panel members were concerned as the session began that the department would carry out its plans without more stringent scrutiny.

No one has been formally named to supervise a new UAP management group authorised under the fiscal 2022 National Defense Authorization Act, according to Chair Andre Carson (D-Ind.).

“The implementation date is rapidly approaching, but the group still lacks a named director,” Carson noted in his opening remarks. “We need to know how the organisation is doing and if there are any roadblocks to getting it up and operating.”

“You must show Congress and the American public, whose imagination you have caught,” he told the witnesses, “that you are determined to follow the facts wherever they lead.” “I worry that the Department of Defense is sometimes more concerned with stressing what it can explain rather than researching what it can’t.”

Also Read: Robert Lewandowski will surely leave Bayern Before 2023, Salihamidzic confirms

Carson also hinted at the possibility of future hearings. “The last time Congress heard about UAPs was over 50 years ago,” he remarked. “I hope it does not take another 50 years for Congress to convene.” Because we urgently require transparency.”

The meeting was also hailed as the beginning of a new chapter in a long and often frustrating search for answers by Rep. Adam Schiff (D-Calif.), who chairs the full House committee.

“We’ve had UAP reports for decades, but we haven’t had an orderly manner for them to be reported — without shame — and examined,” he said in prepared remarks. “This has to change.” It is the responsibility of those we entrust with our national security to investigate anything we don’t comprehend or can’t identify in our air space. “And please report back.”

“It is also the responsibility of… government and this panel to disclose as much as we can with the American people — because excessive secrecy creates distrust and conjecture,” Schiff continued.

Tags: ufo,ufo,ufo,ufo,ufo,ufo,foreo ufo,ufo reports,ufo,ufo hearing today,ufo congress hearing,ufo hearing,ufo 听证 会,congressional hearing,project blue book,ronald moultrie,mars door,congressional hearing,

Leave a Comment

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Scroll to Top